GRAMATYKA POLSKA STAROŻYTNA — ANCIENT POLISH GRAMMAR
THE MORE I talk ABOUT POLISH GRAMMAR AS PATTERNS OF ANCIENT GRAMMAR …
all the more I can see how complicated it can be for the recipient.
Actually, it’s only when I make these films that I want them to be very short – that I notice how more and more complicated it becomes.
I’m already in the 2nd part.
I NEVER SAID THAT IT WAS SIMPLE.
ANCIENT GRAMMAR, WHETHER SANSCRIT OR POLISH, IS NOT SIMPLE.
IT IS FULL. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS. IT IS FULL OF LOGIC AND TRANSLATION OF EVERYTHING.
The first series was kind of an introduction, and there was a lot about philosophy. Now, however, we are getting more and more into the details of grammar.
I was talking about the noun. And it was very difficult to say briefly, so the film came out 30 minutes long, which worries me. But it could not be said less. It was the absolute minimum in time.
And there were only a few views of this video. I suspect no one watches it as soon as I record the episodes … 😉
And I suspect that the recipient must think through each issue …
If he has already found a movie and has set himself the task of following what this ancient grammar is …
It is a complete logical very deep system.
I said with nouns that we actually have three genders – masculine feminine and neuter.
Yet the neuter can be either male or female, and therefore varies either according to the pattern of male or female endings.
Everything can be explained beautifully here and there are no exceptions. There is logic.
But of course this is a higher level of complication than we even have in Polish grammar right now.
And this has nothing to do with Latin, which is simpler than Polish.
It does refer to Sanskrit, and yet, after reading the current Panini grammar, I decided that it was not the primary grammar of Arya.
No. Sanskrit in its present form has more descriptions and acceptance of structures than Polish, but it is not an ancient Aryan grammar.
Too many changes there were made against the beginning.
Anyway .. it is natural. Our languages simply evolved separately, and in the Kali Yuga there was a process of deliberate and unintentional obscuration and preservation of ancient knowledge, including in grammar, everywhere.
The day after tomorrow I will make a film about the Adjectives and Personal Pronoun JA
Because it is related. We have two types of adjective conjugation, „noun” and „adjective”
These are names related to the forms, not the meaning.
The adjectival conjugation had the personal PRONNA JA added after its initial form (advice, advice, cheerful, cheerful).
CHANGED BY TYPES AND NUMBERS 🙂
This was because the nouns describing materially existing beings, as it were, took a form
rad, advice …
and neuter nouns – took the form rad / council + PRONIM.
Why. I will tell you exactly what it looked like the day after tomorrow.
So it is not that „rad advice” — is some secondary or primary form of the adjective. No . Both forms were used, depending on which noun the adjective was connected with. CLARO ?? 🙂
HOWEVER, I MUST WORRY THAT PRONIMS ARE AT ALL A UNIVERSITY OF DRIVING .. And this is what the next film after Adjectives will be about.
Even the pronoun „I” HAD SEPARATE FORMS FOR GENDER AND NUMBERS …
Depending on WHO SAID — ME
🙂
With God.
